Pro-Abortion Activist Testifies To Congress That Men Can Get Pregnant And Have Abortions

A Democrat witness testifying before the House Judiciary Committee on abortion struggled to define what a ‘woman’ is and claimed men are capable of getting pregnant and having abortions.

Ladies and gentlemen … the party of Science™!

Aimee Arrambide who, according to one bio, “has worked in the reproductive rights and justice movement for the majority of her professional career,” was asked by Representative Dan Bishop (R-NC) Wednesday to define what “a woman is.”

“I believe that everyone can identify for themselves,” she replied.

Fair enough, but that doesn’t answer the question. Let’s say somebody identifies as a woman – what does that mean?

The hearing really blurred the lines of reality when Bishop moved into the subject of men and their biological characteristics.

“Do you believe that men can become pregnant and have abortions?” Bishop asked.

“Yes,” responded Arrambide.

Rep. @jdanbishop: “Do you believe men can become pregnant and have abortions?”

Dem abortion witness: “Yes.” pic.twitter.com/M5DebkLriN

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) May 18, 2022

RELATED: ‘Squad’ Member Cori Bush Wants to Know Why There Isn’t Any ‘Sperm Regulation Legislation’ For Men

Men Can Get Pregnant, Have Abortions

It’s rather remarkable that the left-wing in this country spent the past two years lecturing everyone on following the science during the pandemic but can’t define a woman, don’t know how male or female reproductive organs work, and don’t understand when life begins or how it develops.

The Political Insider’s Deborah Francisco recently covered the rejection of “The Science” by the left when it comes to abortion, and lo and behold, here we are!

A Democrat witness for abortion rights testified before the House Judiciary Committee and said that men can get pregnant and have abortions. Democrats have become the party of the insane and are unhitched from reality.

— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) May 19, 2022

Arrambide just single-handedly wiped away the decades-old argument from pro-abortionists that fighting to repeal Roe v. Wade is an attempt by men to control women’s bodies. 

A recent attempt by Democrats to codify Roe v. Wade into law was dubbed the “Women’s Health Protection Act.”

Oh, those anti-woke, sexist people. How dare they use a word they can’t define?

For the record, Dictionary.com defines woman as “an adult female person.” A female is “a person bearing two X chromosomes in the cell nuclei and normally having a vagina, a uterus and ovaries, and developing at puberty a relatively rounded body and enlarged breasts, and retaining a beardless face; a girl or woman.”

Aside from the nugget of secret information that men can get pregnant and have abortions, Arrambide also gave shocking testimony about when it is acceptable to terminate a life.

Representative Mike Johnson (R-LA) asked the Democrat witness that very question.

“What is the principal distinction between the human being that is 2-years-old, or 9-months-old, or 1-week-old, or an hour-old and one that is 8 inches further up the birth canal?” Johnson asked.

Arrambide replied, “I trust people to determine what to do with their own bodies—full stop.”

REP. JOHNSON: “What is the principal distinction between the human being that is 2-years-old, or 9-months-old, or 1-week-old, or an hour-old and one that is 8 inches further up the birth canal?”

ARRAMBIDE: “I trust people to determine what to do with their own bodies—full stop.” pic.twitter.com/yEvnjwikSe

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) May 18, 2022

RELATED: Tucker Carlson Mocks Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Inability To Define ‘Woman’ – Complete With Graphic Of The Female Reproductive System

Democrats Can’t Define Woman

While it would be easy to dismiss the Democrat witness’s testimony as fringe, it’s important to note her statements are indistinguishable from those of mainstream lawmakers from the party of Science™.

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) became the subject of ridicule after a politically-correct rant in which she described women as “menstruating people.”

Rep. @AOC: Texas’ pro-life law perpetuates “rape culture”

“What this is about is controlling women’s bodies, & controlling people who are not cisgender men. This is about making sure that someone like me .. or any menstruating person … cannot make decisions over their own body” pic.twitter.com/ttLc7Ow4PX

— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 8, 2021

“Trans men & non-binary people can also menstruate,” AOC later claimed.

Not just women! Trans men & non-binary people can also menstruate.

Some women also *don’t* menstruate for many reasons, including surviving cancer that required a hysterectomy.

GOP mad at this are protecting the patriarchal idea that women are most valuable as uterus holders. pic.twitter.com/BJovcw1qPa

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) September 8, 2021

AOC’s comments were similar to those made by fellow Squad member Representative Cori Bush (D-MO), who had defined mothers as “birthing people.”

Every day, Black birthing people and our babies die because our doctors don’t believe our pain. My children almost became a statistic. I almost became a statistic.

I testified about my experience @OversightDems today.

Hear us. Believe us. Because for so long, nobody has. pic.twitter.com/rExrMXzsSQ

— Congresswoman Cori Bush (@RepCori) May 6, 2021

Bush recently demonstrated her lack of knowledge regarding conception, arguing that the equivalent of limiting the ability to abort a baby in women would be to pass legislation regulating sperm in men.

Yes, she actually said that.

 

Beyond that, Democrats just paved the way for soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who also cannot define what a ‘woman’ is.

“Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’” Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) asked on the second day of Jackson’s confirmation hearings.

“Can I provide a definition? No,” Jackson replied.

The Republican senator replied, “You can’t?”

“Not in this context,” explained Jackson. “I’m not a biologist.”

Senator Blackburn: “Can you provide a definition for the word woman?”

Judge Jackson: “No. I can’t…I’m not a biologist.” pic.twitter.com/TRlqUeDGs6

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) March 23, 2022

Think about that for a moment – the next Justice of the Supreme Court is intellectually indiscernible from a random Democrat witness who is so woke she thinks men can get pregnant and have abortions.