🌑🌺 VORTEX of LIFE & Nature's Secrets 🍁



IF YOU LIKE THESE VIDEOS, YOU CAN MAKE A SMALL DONATION VIA PAYPAL or BITCOIN PAYPAL LINK: …

source

Similar Posts

44 Comments

  1. Hey I have been a fan for years just now finally in a position to donate thank you for all the knowledge Kenneth I'm a Cwi and 23 year veteran welder fabricator chassis builder prototypist if ever I can help you let me know

  2. Had a profound moment during this video. The desire for liberation is the same as the desire for material. The desire for what is to somehow be more than what it is, is the issue. The mind believing now is not perfect and that some "thing" should be added or subtracted to what is and that will somehow make this feeling inside better, is in fact evil. It is more than what is so it is excess, so it is evil. If it was supposed to be differently, it would be. Even if the imagined motive is "enlightenment" it is still a desire for now to be different. This goes to the root of the human condition of imagined mental suffering. This also resonates with an experience I had a few years back that none of the religions or spiritual teaches have expressed the way you have. Thank you for sharing your wisdom kind sir. May this wisdom spread far and wide.

  3. Hi Ken. Your thoughts on the significance/derivation of 666 were very interesting. Would it be possible for you to spell out the Greek and/or Latin words that underpin your explanation? The number is certainly very interesting, being the sum of the integers from 1 to 36, which can thus be placed on a (magic) square of 6 x 6, which Qabalistic doctrines would associate with the Sun. Interestingly, though, few people seem to notice that the number 666 is also mentioned in a passage in the first book of Kings, according to which 'the weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents' (1 Kings 10: 14, NIV translation). One might imagine that the author of Revelation was also aware of that. The number is certainly interesting. I find your analysis thought-provoking. Thanks so much for sharing your wisdom and insights.

  4. Is Ken a globalist? or does he believe the Earth is Stationary?
    It's the biggest deception out there so where does he stand? Terra firma? or a spinning ball?

  5. i love this, you explain it so well, and it also confirms my own theory of evil, you should of seen my shearer mates eyes when i told him your explanation of excess, much love. i have been searching to try and understand the XsS pronounciation but im hopeless with english and cant find much info, would love more info or webpages

  6. " The path up is the path down: Beautiful simplistic truth Ken. Its always wonder full listening to you ramble in the most free flowing way that you do.
    Your words slice falsities and dissolve them into no things that they already are.
    You are a gem ………………. some may even say a Nagual that is passing your knowledge on to them as apprentices, which in turn helps obtain what some call ‘total freedom'.
    From a Mountain in OZ I smile and say Gidday mate, you're real beaut!

  7. Hey Ken,
    Can you explain Cerenkov Radiation and why radioactive material produces a blue light underneath water? I watched a video about a physicist explaining it, and damn was he ever full of himself. It would be nice to hear your perspective on this, and I believe it would make a great video. Thanks for all you do.

  8. Hey Ken, question for ya. I'm not sure if I understood you correctly but in a previous video I think you implied at one point that if you take two north ends or two south ends of a magnet, and force them together, it creates a di-electric field between the two. That should increase the objects "gravitational pull", correct?

  9. Yeah even though you say photons don't exist or whatever it's just a representation of a separate particle but within the wave that collapses to a particle to The Observer…. so far from what I gather basically you're just saying that there's really nothing at all throughout the whole universe that it is just all an imagination or just a field of invisible Consciousness energy basically?

  10. WHY A VORTEX AND NOT STRAIGHT DIRECTLY TO COUNTERSPACE? GOTTO LEARN MUSIC BUDDY!. YOU INSIST IN NOT EXPLAINING WHY, IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO AFFIRM THAT MAGNETISM IS TOROIDAL…WHY IS IT SO? ….LOVE MOVES THE WORLD, THAT EXPLAINS IT. SINE AND COSINE…YA KNOW BUDDY, THE LEGS OF THE PYTHAGOREAN TRIANGLE..

  11. I would like to see a video on refraction from a lense expert. Mainly I would like to know why the horizon keeps rising, showing us an apparently flawless right side up mirage that is miles and miles beyond the geometric curve of playnet. Are we really spinning two million mph four different vectors like a tilt a whirl but don't feel anything? I can jump up and down yet gravity defies the centrifugal force of an equator turning faster than sound? Lakes look like glass on a calm day wouldn't they be sloshing around from change of speeds in an elliptical orbit? Gas goes up against gravity and presses against..a vacuum? What if I have a hard time believing nasser when don't make sense, and because they get caught lying everyday. Blink twice if you're not allowed to say anything.

  12. Have you checked pbs space time channel? They just keep stacking "fields" just to justify Einstein. They just can´t accept they don´t know anything about realitys true nature.

  13. Big love, man. I enjoyed your vid. I am struggling to comprehend your contest of 'Atomic Theory'. I wholeheartedly agree that Man is ignorant of his ignorance. Further: you cannot put brains into sh*t. The brain activation and car gearbox analogy you made – is the 'gear' top gear, or 5th gear, or 6th gear? Keep up the great work.

  14. I have discovered the secret to build magnetic moto and I can correct all the failing magnetic motor on YouTube is there any price for that .
    I can correct the mistake of professor john searl generator bt I have my own state of the art design I need advice can it be called perpetual machine please contact me

  15. STEPHEN CROTHERS and Yourself, I consider are a few of the most brilliant minds alive! Sadly most barely have a light on or a dim glow in between the ears! Genius is wanting to know how it works! Not just being entertained by the mechanics in motion! When the apple hits you on the head, most eat it some eat it and ponder what a miracle it is!

  16. We have the magnetic field of the Earth, and we have the North pole, our compass confirms the poles existance. No matter where you are on earth the compass will be magneticly attracted to the North pole evan in southern hemisphere! Shouldn't the compass point south if yor south of the equator? How can it be there is no south pole magnetic attraction? All magnets/magnetic fields have two poles, we got the north so where is the south?
    This is where the vortex rears its toroidal awakening. You see I logically asert the idea that the south pole exists on an inverse plain completely hidden to our existance, like 2 dinner plates inverted, but joined.. With a vortexial toroidal field linking 2 opposite plains of existance. Our flat plain, and our counter plain.. Think about a movie from the 80s called "dark city". Is this possible? 😉

  17. I enjoy listening to your work, One point that always puzzles me, your belief that we are traveling through space on a globe, This is only a mathematical construct
    needing to use relative motion as a deceptive mathematical trick. Let me explain with an example.
    Childs roundabout with seat on the edge.

    1. Rotates at a constant rate this will push the child at a constant rate into the seat back.

    2. Roundabout rotates at a constant rate and moves along a track at a constant rate, (Rigid body rotation with translation) the child will be pushed into the seat
    back at a constantly changing rate. (As with a UFO fairground ride)

    3. Place the roundabout in a carriage, rotating at a constant rate, carriage moving along the track at a constant rate, we are told if you are within an object ( carriage )
    moving at a constant rate all movement within is as if the carriage is not moving. Will be the same as (1.)

    For (2) we can use the known physics to workout the changing force on the seat back,
    in (3) we are told all motion is relative to the carriage the force on the seat back will be constant, it is not.

    Adding a carriage can not change what is happening overall the the child on the seat. Only the math tells you this, not the experienced reality of the child.

    Transfer this to a point on the equator, the orbiting ISS, both being rigid body rotation with translation around a sun,
    On the equator the journey around the sun will change by 2000mph in 24hr.
    In the ISS it changes by over 30'000mph in 1.5hr.
    The trick is to make all movement relative to the globe, ignoring the movement around the sun.
    A con of physics.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *